Stalking — in plain language

a repeated pattern of unwanted following, contacting, or surveilling a specific person that causes that person to reasonably fear for their safety

From a fixed, curated glossary of 7,257 legal terms. Not legal advice. How it's made: plainlanguage.us/trust

Plain language

a repeated pattern of unwanted following, contacting, or surveilling a specific person that causes that person to reasonably fear for their safety

  • repeated unwanted following or contacting
  • persistent threatening pursuit
  • obsessive conduct causing fear

What to watch for

  • Most statutes require a pattern or course of conduct — multiple acts over time — not a single incident; do not imply one frightening encounter automatically qualifies.
  • Physical following is not required; electronic contact such as repeated texts, emails, GPS tracking, or social media harassment can satisfy the pattern element under cyberstalking provisions.
  • The legal standard is objective — whether a reasonable person in the victim's position would fear for their safety — not simply whether this particular victim felt scared.
  • Stalking and harassment overlap but are distinct; stalking typically requires the conduct to cause fear of bodily harm, while harassment may rest on emotional distress or annoyance alone.

A Pattern, Not a Single Incident. Most anti-stalking statutes require more than one or two acts — a "course of conduct" or "pattern" that unfolds over time. A single threatening call or one instance of following someone, standing alone, usually does not meet the statutory threshold. Plain rewrites should preserve this recurring-conduct element rather than suggesting any one disturbing act is enough.

Cyberstalking Is Still Stalking. Electronic conduct — repeated unwanted texts, emails, social media messages, GPS tracking, or posting private information online — qualifies as stalking under most modern state statutes. Many non-lawyers assume the crime requires physical presence or following. It does not; a stalker who never leaves home can still commit the offense entirely through a phone or computer.

Common Misunderstandings by Non-Lawyers.

  • "Stalking means someone physically following you everywhere." (No — the pattern of conduct can be entirely electronic, through third parties, or through surveillance devices.)
  • "You have to receive an explicit threat to have a stalking case." (Not necessarily — fear of bodily harm arising from the overall pattern of conduct can be enough, even without a direct threat.)
  • "One creepy incident makes it stalking." (Usually not — the law requires a pattern over time, and most statutes require more than two distinct acts before prosecution is possible.)

Stalking is a crime in all fifty U.S. states and under federal law, consisting of a willful, repeated course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or suffer substantial emotional distress. California enacted the first U.S. anti-stalking statute in 1990 following high-profile cases involving celebrities; the other states quickly followed. Most statutes require three core elements: a pattern of conduct — typically more than two incidents — directed at a specific person, carried out in a way that would make a reasonable person afraid. An explicit threat is not always required; repeated following, unwanted contact, surveillance, or electronic harassment can together make up the pattern. Stalking frequently arises in the context of intimate partner violence, where one partner refuses to accept the end of a relationship and pursues, monitors, or contacts the other person repeatedly.

Meanings by context

cyberstalking: Using phones, computers, or the internet to repeatedly contact or surveil someone in a way that makes them fear for their safety.

aggravated stalking: Stalking that also involves a real, believable threat of violence, or stalking while a court order already bars contact — treated as a more serious felony in most states.

Examples

Plain: The defendant repeatedly followed or contacted the victim in ways that made her reasonably afraid for her safety, which is a crime under state law.

Plain: The court issued an order barring the respondent from following, watching, or reaching out to the victim in any way, including by phone or online.

Plain: Deliberately and repeatedly frightening someone to the point where they fear serious harm is a more serious grade of stalking in most states.

Where you'll see it

  • criminal charges and sentencing
  • protective order petitions
  • domestic violence proceedings
  • workplace safety policies
  • harassment
  • intimate partner violence
  • peeping
  • domestic violence
  • protective order
  • cyberstalking

Word details

Pronunciation
STAW-king
Part of speech
noun
Origin
Old English — from Old English 'stealcian' — to walk stealthily or to track prey; originally hunting vocabulary
Domains
criminal law, family law, tort law
Frequency
common
Formality
moderate

Have a whole document? Paste it at plainlanguage.us — every legal term explained at once. Free, no signup.

Need this as JSON? The Developer API returns definition cards with exact offsets — $0.0025/operation. → /docs